![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
sabotabbyRather than spend money to make the city more accessible, New York City has decided to replace signage with the old accessibility symbol with a new one.
The one you've all seen:
The new one:
Er.
The major problems with this have already been pointed out in the comments, but to recap:
1. It's visually cluttered with the useless second wheel.
2. It looks like a Cubist Goatse.
3. If your posture was like that in an actual wheelchair, you would probably be falling out of it.
4. Wait, where's the back of the wheelchair?
5. It presents a patronizing view of all disabled people being inspirational wheelchair athletes or some such.
My problem is mainly #1 (hilariously ironic, considering the number of visually impaired people who will have difficulty reading it) and #5 (no matter how spunky you make your representation of disability, it still sucks to get around in a wheelchair in pretty much every place I've ever been to). It's yet another example of well-meaning people doing something to feel as though they're doing something.
By the way, there's nothing wrong with visually static icons in signage. Washroom signs (portraying able-bodied, gendered people) are pretty static looking:
(Though I vastly prefer the ones David Carson shows in this video, as they do away with silly gender essentialist norms altogether and focus on the practicalities.)
Anyway. Progress, or major headdesk moment: Discuss!
The one you've all seen:
The new one:
Er.
The major problems with this have already been pointed out in the comments, but to recap:
1. It's visually cluttered with the useless second wheel.
2. It looks like a Cubist Goatse.
3. If your posture was like that in an actual wheelchair, you would probably be falling out of it.
4. Wait, where's the back of the wheelchair?
5. It presents a patronizing view of all disabled people being inspirational wheelchair athletes or some such.
My problem is mainly #1 (hilariously ironic, considering the number of visually impaired people who will have difficulty reading it) and #5 (no matter how spunky you make your representation of disability, it still sucks to get around in a wheelchair in pretty much every place I've ever been to). It's yet another example of well-meaning people doing something to feel as though they're doing something.
By the way, there's nothing wrong with visually static icons in signage. Washroom signs (portraying able-bodied, gendered people) are pretty static looking:
(Though I vastly prefer the ones David Carson shows in this video, as they do away with silly gender essentialist norms altogether and focus on the practicalities.)
Anyway. Progress, or major headdesk moment: Discuss!
no subject
Date: 2013-05-25 11:55 pm (UTC)This is the problem with what some would term political correctness and I would call euphemism. If no one understands what your organization's name/your municipal signage/your learning disability diagnosis is supposed to mean, it's not very effective or helpful.
I'm okay with people using a wheelchair as shorthand for all mobility-related disabilities, because there's no way you're going to get them all in there, and it's the easiest to recognize in icon form.
Designers definitely need work, so I don't have a problem with that as such. I just would rather that money go to putting elevators in the subways or something.
(My closest subway stop, predictably, has no elevators. The escalators only go up and are separated by some stairs put there as a fuck-you to disabled people.)
no subject
Date: 2013-05-26 01:24 pm (UTC)I was on a disability chit for about six months there, a couple of years ago when my back, shoulder, hips, and knee all conspired to make little things like getting in and out of the car or, you know, even standing pretty much a challenge of which inspirational movies are made. Except it's probably not very inspirational to see some middle-aged woman with a cane just standing there quietly crying to herself because she hurts so much and there's a fucking two-inch curb in her way that she can't get over. Somehow I doubt the Chariots of Fire theme would be playing in the background over that one.
That sign seems completely pointless and potentially confusing to me, making it the worst sort of boondoggle; but what is making me really mad right now is the bit about your subway station having no elevator and only an up escalator. Because, hey anyone can go down stairs, right? ><
Yes, unless you're in a fucking wheelchair, obviously; but last summer when things were acting up again I had to train Karl on how to separate the clothes and put a wash on (with step-by-step guidance, of course; he's really smart but also he was only seven) because there was absolutely no way for me to get down the basement steps to the laundry. I could just manage the steps to the upstairs, and the outside steps, because I had my cane in one hand and the railing in the other, and if I went slowly and carefully it was still agony but at least it was physically possible. The basement steps didn't have any railings for the top half and without one there, it was absolutely, literally impossible for me to get down. I simply couldn't lower either of my feet that far without having something on both sides to support me, and leaning against the wall wasn't enough.
So, Sabs's subway station, fuck you with your assumption of "everyone can go down." These designers really, really need to spend a day (or better yet, a week) trying to navigate the system in a wheelchair before they decide that an up escalator is enough. Assholes.
no subject
Date: 2013-05-26 07:22 pm (UTC)They're supposed to be putting an elevator in soon, but who knows when that'll happen.
no subject
Date: 2013-05-27 12:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-05-27 12:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-05-27 10:46 am (UTC)GEE I SURE HOPE NOBODY NEEDS AN ELEVATOR THERE FOR THE NEXT TWO YEARS oh no wait they do. ><
no subject
Date: 2013-05-27 10:42 am (UTC)Meanwhile, hmm, maybe some kind of petition? They could put those motorized ramps in. You know, like the ones they have for shopping carts in certain huge stores.
Except of course you aren't allowed ON the motorized ramp with your shopping cart so that probably wouldn't work either. Dammit.
Yeah, probably an elevator would be the best but that thing is gonna get awfully choked up at rush hour. Maybe a letter to the transit authority (cc'd to the mayor's office like it would do any good) signed by the housing associations of each of the various appropriate apartment blocks or whatever. Plus a petitions left in the lobbies of each, and at the station itself.
That's a pretty serious disconnect from reality. In the States I believe one could enforce the installation of an elevator via the Americans with Disabilities Act, but I'm not sure Canada or Ontario has something similar yet. We probably do, but it's probably completely toothless and would need to go before the Supreme Court to get enforced. And who has that much energy?
Hah, maybe try the petition/letter and if that doesn't work, take a class-action lawsuit against the TTA for having stations that aren't all fully accessible. Pretty sure all public buildings/services are supposed to be, y'know, accessible. It might light a fire under their butts if nothing else.
no subject
Date: 2013-05-27 12:44 pm (UTC)Probably not at my station. It doesn't get insane traffic at rush hour.
That's a pretty serious disconnect from reality. In the States I believe one could enforce the installation of an elevator via the Americans with Disabilities Act, but I'm not sure Canada or Ontario has something similar yet. We probably do, but it's probably completely toothless and would need to go before the Supreme Court to get enforced. And who has that much energy?
We have the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act, but it's pretty toothless compared to the ADA. One of the interesting things I heard over the years was that the US's constant warmongering meant a higher number of (relatively young and active) people with disabilities, and thus a better commitment to access for everyone. Go figure.
no subject
Date: 2013-05-27 01:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-05-27 01:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-05-27 08:42 pm (UTC)To be fair to the organization, it is working to make the entire system accessible but it gets bugger all in the way of funding from provincial or federal government so change happens very slowly.
The first accessible station was built in '96.
AODA, implemented in 2005, made it mandatory to make the system accessible. The plan was to have them done by 2020 but budget cuts (Hello Right Wing Bastards) have delayed that to 2025.
All buses in service are now accessible.
Current Streetcars aren't. Their replacements will be.